Copyright law protects the rights of authors (creators of
original works). It was written into the United States Constitution
in 1787 when the printing press was the primary means of reproducing
works. Since then, the technology to enable copying has evolved
dramatically.
Allowable or Infringing use?
Under the “fair use” doctrine, limited use of a
copyrighted work is allowed for personal or educational use.
Penalties for infringement are severe. Minimum damages are
$750 for each copyrighted work that was infringed, with higher
damages if the infringement is “willful,” plus
costs and attorneys fees.
Technology Advances
Copy machines and VCRs are examples of the progression of copying
technology. The courts struggled to establish standards for
allowable use of these technologies. It is also allowable
to make a few copies for personal use or to record a movie
for viewing at another time. Making money from a copyright
protected work is not allowed without permission from the
Copyright owner.
File sharing capability, such as with Napster and Grokster,
have enabled downloading music from the Internet. This has
caused upheaval in the music industry. Proceeds from the legitimate
sale of music support not only the recording artists and songwriters,
but also all the support staff and the workers in the sales
and distribution channels. To protect their profits, the record
companies have resorted to suing individuals (including minor
children) with their claims of damages.
The lawsuits have not stopped the copying. Technology continues
to progress. P2P (peer to peer) networking capability, such
as BitTorrent (which was created to enable the transmission
of huge electronic files to assist Linux developers) has now
been applied to the copying of TV shows and films. The Motion
Picture Association of America (MPAA) has filed lawsuits to
stop the trading of pirated movies and TV programs over the
Internet.
Law Enforcement Ineffective
The reality is that counterfeiting is rampant (and spans many
industries in addition to music, including for example, computer
software and apparel). Enforcement efforts are undermined
by the public perception that greedy companies maximize every
dollar and prevent consumers from getting a good deal.
The U.S. Congress tried to help with the
Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which made it against
the law to circumvent copyright protection mechanisms, but
it has been ineffective and misapplied. For example, Lexmark
tried to prevent remanufactured (refilled) toner cartridges
for its printers by invoking DMCA, alleging copyright infringement
of the interface software code. The case has implications
for all “aftermarket” businesses
(e.g., video game cartridges for games, or windshield wipers
for autos).
Lawsuits, and laws, lag technology and are, at best, only
a temporary way to protect rights and profits.
New Business Models
It is much more effective to adopt a business
model that anticipates the reality of copying and find a way
to make money in spite of it. Evolving business models include
subscription pricing and pay per use. These models enable consumers
to obtain copies “legally” for a reasonable price.
Another evolving model is illustrated by
Amazon, which has opened up its API’s (application programming interfaces)
to enable a whole range of “partners” to access
Amazon’s data and build their own storefronts that draw
on the Amazon data and infrastructure. Amazon insists that
purchases be completed through Amazon and the “partner” site
owners receive a commission. With this approach, Amazon expands
its customer reach and the partners profit from leveraging
the Amazon data and infrastructure.
Technology Continues to Advance.
In conclusion, copying and counterfeiting are a reality worldwide
and especially in countries such as China. To protect rights
and profits, businesses must adapt. Staying competitive requires
keeping ahead of the copycats and the changing technology.
Companies cannot rely on law enforcement to stop copying,
nor is it realistic to stifle the advancement of technology.
It is much more effective to develop a business model that
embraces the reality of advancing technology.
Jean D. Sifleet, Esq., CPA
Business Attorney
120 South Meadow Road
Clinton, MA 01510 USA
t. 978-368-6104
f. 978-368-6105
c.978-618-2162
P.S. A successful business uses a combination of legal protections
and smart business practices. If you know someone who could
benefit from this information, please forward this enews to
their attention. Thanks!
To subscribe, please fill out the form below.
Jean Sifleet, business attorney, CPA and three-time entrepreneur, is pleased to announce the release of her new book, Advantage “IP”: Profit from Your Great Ideas. Visit the Smartfast Bookstore for details, and to order the book.